Flatpay UK · Portfolio Analysis · June 2026

Where the book is deviating from expected TPV

2,520 active merchants. The portfolio is running ~30% below the TPV it was expected to produce — and the miss isn't evenly spread. Two patterns are structural: merchant size and maturity.

−30%
TPV-weighted deviation
~47.5M
TPV shortfall to-date
70%
Merchants below plan
40%
Missing by >half

Deviation % = (Actual TPV to-date − Expected to-date) / Expected. Weighted = dollar-weighted across the book (the true economic read); the median merchant sits at −32%. Mean is only −16%, flattered by a long tail of big overperformers — so the weighted figure is the one to trust. Blended multi-country export (93% GB; figures in the file's mixed units).

01

The bigger the expected merchant, the worse the miss

Deviation worsens monotonically with expected size. The obvious objection — that big merchants are just newer and haven't ramped — doesn't hold: the gradient survives among mature merchants live 120+ days. This is an expectation-setting problem at the top of the book, not a ramp artifact.

Full cohort Mature only (120+ days live)
<250k
−18 / −15
250–500k
−26 / −23
500k–1M
−38 / −38
1M+
−43 / −38

Bar length ∝ |weighted deviation|. n = 1,894 / 402 / 145 / 78 merchants by bucket.

Where the money actually leaks

By absolute shortfall, the 500k–1M bucket is the single largest drag at −12.9M from just 145 merchants. The 500k–2M midmarket together is the core of the gap. Small merchants (<250k) miss too, but each miss is small. The leverage is in fixing how 500k+ deals are sized.

02

Deviation doesn't improve with age inside the first year

Across the UK book's first twelve months, every maturity band sits flat at −32% to −38%. There's no visible ramp recovery — merchants aren't closing the gap as they mature.

0–60 d
−38% n 1225
60–120 d
−32% n 638
120–180 d
−37% n 294
180–365 d
−34% n 271

The flatness is the tell. If merchants genuinely ramped into plan over their first year, you'd see the later bands recover — they don't. That leaves two live explanations, both worth confirming: either Expected TPV to-date isn't being ramp-phased (so a young merchant is judged against a full run-rate it was never going to hit yet, making part of the deviation mechanical), or the expectation is set correctly and merchants simply aren't reaching it. The 365+ day cohort that would normally settle this question is excluded here — those are older non-UK signings and don't belong in a UK maturity read.

By install month, the recent waves are worst — Dec 2025 −50%, Jan 2026 −39% — and that's where almost all the volume sits, dragging the blended figure down.

03

Teams — West is the problem to name

West carries the largest expected book and one of the worst deviations. It alone is a quarter of the entire portfolio shortfall.

TeamMerchantsWeighted devShortfall
West486−47%−11.9M
London 198−39%−4.4M
East269−37%−5.5M
North184−36%−5.5M
London 2122−27%−5.8M
Telesales313−15%−2.5M

Telesales runs closest to plan because it writes small tickets (avg ~127k expected) that are easier to hit. West, London 1 and East all carry large average tickets — the same size signal as Section 01.

04

Salespeople — and why they differ

The spread between reps is large, and not random: reps who write the biggest average expected TPV per merchant tend to deviate most (correlation −0.22). Over-promising on size resurfaces as deviation.

Worst (≥8 merchants)

RepnDevAvg exp
Sameer Khan70−65%244k
Gagan Virdi57−59%262k
Krish Patel46−59%291k
Chaudhary Taha55−58%196k
Pranav Limbachiya69−42%370k
Richard Dajlanaj62−42%392k

Closest to plan

RepnDevAvg exp
Dana Silver55−9%94k
Alessandro Righini69−9%179k
Ashmik Paul60−14%238k
Stina Seripova44−15%238k
Shabir Valis56−16%206k
Doruk Öncüloğlu27−16%838k

Avg exp = average Expected Yearly TPV per merchant. Doruk is the instructive exception — large tickets, still close to plan — worth understanding what he sizes differently.

05

What I'd do with this

One lever above the rest: the expected-TPV sizing model for 500k+ merchants. It explains the size gradient, much of the rep dispersion, and the largest absolute shortfall. West's sizing in particular warrants a direct look.

Verify before this goes up

1 · Confirm whether "Expected TPV to-date" is ramp-phased or a flat pro-rata of the annual number. If flat, the young-cohort miss is partly an artifact and the real problem narrows to the size gradient.

2 · Decide whether to strip the older non-UK signings out of the headline too — they're still sitting in the blended −30% and ~47.5M figures, so a UK-only read would shift those slightly worse.


Source: portfolio export, 2,520 active merchants with complete TPV and install data. Country mix GB 95% / IT 3% / DK 2% / DE <1%. IT (−9%) and DE (+8%) run ahead of plan on small samples; GB (−34%) and DK (−29%) drag.